Blog
July 15, 2021
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Levvel Research’s Insurance Executive Report analyzed insurance industry insights and their heavy reliance on legacy systems. The insurance industry has been slower than most industries to adopt modern technologies, making it difficult to stay competitive and offer an experience on par with the expectations of their insured.
Many insurers are functioning on outdated legacy systems, like old technology stacks and neglected architecture. While some national insurance companies have followed the direct-to-consumer trend, many insurers haven’t begun modernizing or don’t know where to start.
The longer they wait, the harder they’ve found it to support these legacy systems and attract and retain large market segments with higher product expectations. Insurtech startups who have fully embraced a personalized digital experience are taking advantage and rapidly acquiring market share.
The need to modernize the insurance industry is critical. However, several challenges can prevent these companies from jumpstarting the modernization of their legacy systems:
1.) Talent Acquisition: To migrate from a legacy system to a more modern infrastructure, organizations that understand the legacy technology and are aware of the business logic embedded into these systems are critical. Access to talent with experience in legacy systems can pose a serious obstacle.
2.) Failure to Adopt Remote Workforce: Compounding the talent acquisition problem is the fact that many legacy insurance companies are not well equipped to support remote workers. Because of the prevalence of on-premises legacy systems, it is difficult to securely provide seamless remote access. Moving to cloud-based systems will ease these pain points.
3.) Hesitancy to Embrace Cloud Computing: Legacy insurance companies rarely have staff with experience and expertise in cloud computing, and therefore are hesitant to embrace it. Typically, they often believe that cloud computing cannot be properly secured or meet regulatory requirements, which usually is not true.
Many of these challenges are just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to legacy systems’ modernization.
As an example scenario, a national insurance company with over $1B in revenue is falling behind when it comes to modernization of their architecture. Industry pressures are pushing insurers like this one to innovate their legacy systems and stay ahead of the competition. Typically, the insurance company supports a legacy technology stack and architecture and has neglected a major overhaul of its technology for far too long.
They were late to follow the trend of insurance organizations going direct-to-consumer, and, when they finally did, they made a half-hearted attempt. Over the last few years, they have been losing an increasing number of their customer base to other competitors that have fully embraced modern, digital solutions.
Due to this problem, the board decided to bring in a new executive responsible for modernizing their direct-to-consumer application and has promised them all the budget and resources needed. This executive’s first big effort is to modernize its direct-to-consumer application to be on par with its competitors and improve acquisition and retention.
The insurance company wants to release its legacy system in nine months and hires a team consisting of external consultants, architects, and designers to supplement its existing staff.
In accordance with modernization best practices, contractors set up a continuous delivery pipeline to ensure code is automatically built, tested, and deployed in a standard way. This requires another server, which they request from the client’s infrastructure team.
However, this seemingly trivial request takes over five weeks to complete. But how can this take so long? The lack of modernization has fueled setbacks, including:
The procurement team needs detailed specifications on the server. In fact, due to their lack of elastic infrastructure, they want to know precise projections on volumes, memory, CPU, and disk usage that are challenging to accurately project at this point in the project.
The server OS team must install an approved server OS image. Then, the server application team will install the required software stack.
Additionally, the server OS team must install an approved server OS image. Then, the server application team will install the required software stack.
Finally, the Identity and Access Management team must set up accounts and access for the required team members.
In parallel, the enterprise architecture team purchased a modern “out-of-the-box” integration platform for the online banking channels. It is not until the developers start to read the documentation that they realize this software is not compatible with the bank’s legacy systems.
To solve this issue, the developers decide to build an adapter to handle the data formats’ conversions. This makes the solution more complex and puts the timeline and cost at risk.
While this insurer is used as a primary example, the challenges associated with legacy systems are prevalent in the industry. These are just some of the technical obstacles the insurance industry may face when attempting to modernize old systems.
As a result of these challenges, the insurer’s deadlines will not be met, and the costs associated with building the new direct-to-consumer application will be larger than the original estimate. Had the insurer migrated to a modern cloud-based architecture earlier, these risks could have been mitigated, and thereby significantly increase the odds of the project being a success.
More technological challenges will arise the longer insurance companies wait to modernize, and the broad impacts of these obstacles will continue to grow. To benchmark the modernization state of insurance against other industries, read our 2020 Insurance Executive Report.
Authored By
Phil Mork
Principal Architecture Consultant
Shabad Sobti
Associate Engineering Consultant
Meet our Experts
Principal Architecture Consultant
Phil Mork is a Principal Architecture Consultant for Levvel. He is responsible for providing architectural insight and guidance on various payment topics which enables clients to deliver on their strategic payments initiatives.
Associate Engineering Consultant
Shabad is an Associate Engineering Consultant at Levvel specializing in Full Stack development ranging from Banking Applications to Logistics Applications. He graduated from the University of Virginia with a Bachelor of Science in Computer Science. Shabad believes that as technologists, it is our responsibility to share and contribute to the wealth of information; after all, Shabad views himself as the product of a vast open-source knowledgebase. Having grown up in Delhi, Shabad brings a unique perspective to the table here in North Carolina and is not afraid to challenge the status quo. Shabad is a technologist at heart and spends the rest of his time playing golf, cooking, and hiking.
Let's chat.
You're doing big things, and big things come with big challenges. We're here to help.