2019 Guide to Procure-to-Pay Change Management


August 7, 2019



Procure-to-Pay (P2P) automation is increasingly necessary in order to remain competitive in the current business environment. Automation also yields significant ancillary benefits, including cost savings, increased efficiency, and an increase in the bottom line. Implementation, though, can be a formidable task.

In order to achieve success with P2P automation, preparation and change management are key. Together, they can mean the difference between failure or success for the implementation. Executed well, preparation allows an organization to determine the optimum solution for its growth and efficiency goals and specific timeline. It also allows users to be on-boarded quickly and ensures strong adoption and usage rates, which are key to achieving a strong, ongoing ROI.

This guide will serve as a resource for organizations considering or preparing to adopt P2P automation software. It offers an outline to P2P change management, starting with a current market overview and an overview of quantitative and qualitative benefits, followed by a list of recommendations on the best practical approach for a few key stages of a technology transformation. Levvel Research’s goal with this guide is to increase the chances and success of a P2P transformation for optimization of the back office.

Market Overview

Across North America, organizations are increasingly adopting automation solutions to address their accounts payable, procurement, and payments operations. The following section provides an overview and analysis of market trends using survey data collected from 2018-2019.

According to Levvel Research survey data, awareness of the value of cloud-based automation tools has increased in recent years, but there is room for growth in terms of adoption rates.

Cloud-based plug-in software has become increasingly flexible, dynamic, and affordable. Many options available today offer features tailored to the needs of different-sized organizations (e.g., a platform designed for the mid-market) and even industry-specific modules (e.g., an invoice data capture solution designed for the manufacturing industry). With capabilities such as real-time access to data, mobile applications, and supplier self-service portals, cloud-based solutions improve control, invoice, PO, and payment life cycle times, costs, and productivity.

For accounts payable, the size of an organization affects the type of solution it chooses to adopt (see Figure 1). Homegrown and ERP-based solutions are most popular among SMEs, but their popularity decreases and the preference for cloud-based solutions increases as organizations scale up. Cloud-based AP solutions are the most flexible, scalable options available today for organizations across revenue segments and business types.

Figure 1

AP Tool Usage by Organization Size

AP Tool Type Based on Organization Size

"If your organization is using an AP automation tool, which type of tool do you use for the majority of your AP processes?"
(n = 134)

Similar adoption patterns occur for procurement automation solutions. Unlike AP, however, the most commonly adopted automation tool is a procurement module that is included in an ERP or in accounting software (see Figure 2). Instead of equally turning to cloud-based solutions, organizations are more likely to utilize a purchasing tool that is included with an existing system, even if it has fewer features or limited capabilities.

Accounting systems and ERPs that offer procurement modules are useful for multiple business functions, and organizations are likely to take advantage of these multipurpose platforms instead of adding another tool to their ecosystem. This is especially true for LMM1 companies, which prioritize maximizing tactical functionality within their current state rather than transforming their business operations, which can be draining on resources. ERP-based tools also minimize training necessary for employees who are already familiar with the system, and thus maximize user adoption.

Figure 2

Procurement Automation Tool Usage by Organization Size

Procurement Module is the Most Commonly Adopted Automation Tool

Which automated procurement solution does your organization primarily use?
(n = 132)

Payment method patterns are similar across company revenue size, although paper-based payment methods (i.e., checks) are slightly more likely to be used by smaller organizations (see Figure 3). Larger organizations are more likely to use an automated payment type, such as wire payments, which is likely due to these companies often having large and/or international supplier bases. Levvel Research hopes to see a decrease in the usage of manual payment types through the adoption of automated ePayments solutions, and the ratio of payment methods skew toward automated ones that are conducive to early discount capture, rebates, and security.

Figure 3

Method of Supplier Management

Payment Method Adoption Is Relatively Standard Across Company Size

What percentage of your supplier-related payments (number of payments, not dollar value) is processed using the following methods?

Barriers to adopting cloud-based automation solutions show similar trends across revenue segments. A shared top barrier for AP, procurement, and payables solutions is a lack of budget (see Figures 4-5); SMEs are more likely to cite this as a top barrier due to disproportionately smaller budgets than the rest of the market. Many organizations also believe that their current processes are adequate enough that they do not need to add software or automate; LMM companies are least likely to list this as a top barrier, as scaling into the UMM makes automation vital. Enterprise organizations are most likely to see executive sponsorship as an issue, due to the number of stakeholders involved and the complexity, scale, and resources associated with software adoption projects.

Figure 4

Barriers to Adopting a Cloud-Based AP Solution

Lack of Budget is the Top Barrier to Adoption

What do you perceive to be the greatest barriers to adopting a cloud-based AP automation solution in your organization?
(n = 199)

Figure 5

Barriers to Adopting a Cloud-Based eProcurement Solution

Current Process Working Cited as Greatest Barrier to eProcurement Solution

What is the main reason your organization does not currently use an automated procurement solution? (Select one.)
(n = 207)


Once organizations decide to move forward with an automation solution, they are likely to see efficiency gains correlative with their level of automation. Whether for AP, procurement, or payments, automation tends to yield improvements such as reduced paper volume, shorter cycle times, greater efficiency, and more transparency, control, and security (see Figures 6-7).

Figure 6

Improvements From Procurement Automation by Organization Size

Department Productivity Cited as the Greatest Improvement from an eProcurement Solution

How has each of the following improved with your organization's automated procurement solution vs prior manual procurement processes? (Selected "Great Improvement")
(n = 132)

Figure 7

Improvements From AP Automation by Organization Size

Reduction in Paper, Quicker Approval Times, and Increased Visibility Are the Top Benefits of Automation

What are the greatest improvements you have seen since implementing an AP management solution? (Select 3)
(n = 134)

Organizations that have embarked on their automation journeys for AP, procurement, and/or payments see not only the qualitative benefits described above, but also quantifiable savings. Levvel Research has separated companies into three categories—Novice, Mainstream, and Innovator—based on their level of automation, and has used these designations to analyze hard cost savings and ROI metrics of automation usage.

Table 1 shows how an organization’s cost per invoice decreases with increased automation. The more automation an organization has, the lower average processing time and higher percentage of electronic invoice receipts they report, leading to lower invoice processing costs and higher rates of discount capture.

Table 1

AP Process Improvements by Automation Maturity Level

Average processing time from invoice receipt to approval45 days23 days5 days
Average processing cost per invoice (combination of paper and electronic)$15.00$6.70$2.36
Percentage of invoices received electronically3%9%32%
Percentage of invoice terms discounts captured18%40%75%

By automating purchasing processes, organizations utilizing procurement automation are able to process more purchase orders per procurement employee. Using a cloud-based eProcurement tool can bring down the cost per PO by 65 percent (see Table 2).

Table 2

Procurement Process Improvements by Automation Maturity Level

MetricsProcurement Automation ToolCost Per PO
NoviceNo tool$89.73
MainstreamERP/homegrown solution$65.05
InnovatorCloud-based eProcurement software$30.72

Payment automation allows an organization to capture more early payment discounts and rebates on current invoice payments. Automating payments also reduces costs in terms of supplies (e.g., printing and mailing materials) and employee labor. Freed from the burden of printing and mailing checks, AP staff can dedicate more time to strategic tasks. Cloud-based payments products can increase efficiencies by integrating simply with existing systems, and their intuitive user interfaces can enable quick implementation and staff onboarding. The relatively quick implementation and efficiency gains of payment automation allow organizations to keep pace in today’s competitive business landscape.

Technology Transformation

When organizations are considering a transformation of their P2P state, it is vital that they approach their initiative with a thorough change management plan. Automating P2P processes does not have a one-size-fits-all solution, and it may be done incrementally, while keeping open the possibility to scale up as needs and/or budgets change. There are a few key stages that typically occur during a technology transformation; the following section provides recommendations on how to approach each stage in order to increase the chances and degree of success for the transformation.

Current State Evaluation

Prior to automation, organizations should map out their current state and comprehensive process metrics, including all current technology, AP users, departments, stakeholders, processing times, labor costs, and error rates. Companies should account for current process workflows and any other variables and details that make the organization’s P2P mechanisms unique. Decision makers should assess information such as the number of ERP systems in place, monthly invoice/PO/payment volume, the number and type of locations where processes take place, and the number of touches (people involved) in existing invoice, purchasing, and payment workflows.

This current state map will improve the configuration stage of implementation, and organizations will be better prepared to identify a solution appropriate to their growth and efficiency goals. They can leverage this data when working with a solution provider to configure and customize a new AP solution to meet all their specifications.

Proper examination of their existing structure gives organizations vital context for comparing possible solutions and sets a solid foundation for future implementations and process changes. With this information, they can use ROI calculators (for pre- and post-automation states), as well as create and track KPIs. When defining goals and planning for transformation, teams should strive to be as clear and precise as possible about how to adopt a solution and its ultimate payoff for the organization. A collective vision should be organized into discrete, well-defined benefits, with each goal being approached with a strategic plan. Those implementing the solution should ensure they value all voices within a company, including all AP, procurement, and finance department staff and managers.

Practitioners should also determine how automation technology will affect future staff additions, task allocations, and potential augmentation. As an organization scales, it is crucial to stay ahead of P2P processes’ needs, rather than addressing pain points after they emerge. Change management teams should incorporate future technology into their organizations’ roadmaps.

Assessing the current AP state prior to technology adoption can go a long way toward determining and pitching the ROI and business case to key decision-makers. With proper preparation and scoping prior to implementation, organizations of all sizes will be ready to successfully begin automating their P2P state.

Building a Business Case

Practitioners pushing for any AP, procurement, or payment automation solution must gain executives’ enthusiasm and support. They should build a thorough and well-researched business case to present to relevant decision makers and C-suite personnel.

A business case should include a current state assessment, estimated savings, ROI metrics, and projected improvements, especially highlighting how an integrated solution would benefit executives directly. An example of a significant benefit is increased visibility into spend data that the C-suite—especially a CFO—will harness with advanced reporting and analytics tools, which will in turn enable them to make more strategic business decisions. Ultimately, aligning the benefits of automation with the company’s business plan will lead to greater buy-in and enthusiasm for technology adoption.

Process Optimization

Applying technology to a broken process is a “band-aid”, not a cure. Organizations should understand that technology is meant to enable improvement, but in order to actually create that improvement, inefficiencies in processes must be evaluated, understood, and optimized as much as possible. Current state optimization should always take place before a solution is purchased.

Prior to technology adoption, departments can assess where bottlenecks typically occur in the current state so as to limit the possibility of these continuing to disrupt processes after automation. Departments can review and potentially restructure things like approval workflows, supplier inquiry management, staff allocation, or invoice storage methods to make sure the current state is set up in a way that minimizes wasted time or low-value activity. Strengthening the current state by identifying and correcting disfunction is also a good way to boost enthusiasm from staff for the solution, as they see how their day-to-day functions have and will continue to improve; this in turn increases the chance of high user adoption of the solution, which increases ROI from the solution.

While organizations should typically address internal processes and teams first, they should not overlook external parties. For example, right before implementing a procurement solution is a perfect time to reevaluate supplier contracts, cleanse supplier data files, and perform other functions that reveal savings and more strategic supplier management opportunities. This is also a good opportunity to reach out to suppliers and prepare them for the coming changes, and ask for feedback on how interaction and processes could be improved for them.

Another valuable action to take prior to software adoption is to establish KPIs for AP and procurement processes. By identifying these in the current state, companies can more easily visualize improvements, and pinpoint problem areas, after implementation. Tracking KPIs is also a very useful way to measure the ROI from technology adoption.

Software Selection

While P2P automation offerings were limited in capabilities and scope just a few years ago, there are many industry- and size-tailored options on the market today. These solution providers are often well positioned to help their customers scale their AP, procurement, or finance departments without losing efficiency or visibility. With an overwhelming number of options available today, though, it is critical that organizations critically evaluate their options.

Organizations should first decide which aspect of their P2P processes they are trying to automate: accounts payable, procurement, payments, or some combination of the three. There are many solutions available on the market today that focus on a specific process, and there are also those that provide a holistic suite with capabilities in all three functions.

Organizations should then identify solution providers that understand the needs of their size, industry, and even existing technical environment (e.g., ERP, supplier communication portals, payment partners, etc.). They should consider all of a providers’ features, helping decision makers better identify which providers’ strengths best meet their organization’s needs.

The selected provider should be flexible, so that the solution can adapt and change as the organization continues to scale. The solution provider should know the organization’s market, both in terms of revenue size and industry. There may be aspects of P2P automation that the organization has not considered because it is still relatively small, but a knowledgeable player in the space would be not only a resource from which to learn but also able to equip the organization with the best tools it needs as it expands.

Technology Integration

With any software implementation, there will be IT architecting necessary, even if coming from a completely manual process. Organizations face a variety of considerations, and it is important to map out requirements and expectations during the solution selection phase. Bringing the IT team in early during selection will also improve the chances of gaining buy-in from a team that is typically reluctant to embrace disruptive new technology with which they are unfamiliar. IT’s support and interest in the software streamlines implementation and onboarding, and improves utilization in the long run.

One of the most important aspects of technology adoption integration. ERP integration is particularly important for AP and procurement software, as is integration with many other existing business process solutions, such as a supplier information management tool, or homegrown solutions that internal teams maintain. Ensuring that systems can and will be properly connected is important for achieving ROI on the new and existing solutions alike.

Some providers offer API-agnostic tools, proffering the ability to connect seamlessly with any ERP, tool, or platform. The actual execution and seamlessness of these connections may vary. In the case of the ERP, agnostic integration capabilities could simply mean the solution supports batch uploads of data between the ERP and the tool, rather than offering a real-time connection. Some providers offer integration specifically built for a single ERP or product line of ERPs, which potentially offers a more seamless experience.

Many P2P providers also have several out-of-the-box (OOTB) integrations for solutions beyond ERPs via partnerships. In some cases, this might go beyond simply a custom integration between two separate systems; it might mean the providers offer an “app ecosystem” that allows the organization to opt-in to certain applications while remaining within the P2P system.

While these OOTB integrations are valuable to certain companies, some solution providers will work with potential and existing customers to build out tailored integrations if they do not offer it already. Finding a provider that is willing to have conversations around custom integrations and development is an important consideration for companies with many systems already in place, or those with systems they are trying to replace or phase out.

Replacing existing processes and systems is a large driver of technology adoption. Some organizations are trying to move from on-premise tools to cloud-based infrastructure; others purchased a similar P2P solution a few years ago but did not have a successful adoption. To that end, an organization should ascertain how much support the existing solution provider can offer for things such as replacing systems, migrating data, and working with other project teams that may be undergoing digital transformation initiatives in other areas of the organization (e.g., cloud migration, DevOps implementation). Technology transformation service offerings vary by providers, but most provide implementation services and support through partners, if not in-house.

Ensuring Long-Term Value

In order to actually gain approval and funding and adopt a solution, members within an organization have likely spent significant time assessing the ROI of the technology. However, that ROI largely depends on the measures an organization takes after the solution is implemented and live. An organization should implement internal controls and practices for continued and improved use of the solution.

One way to ensure the long-term value of a solution is to take advantage of its measurement tools. Many solutions offer reporting/monitoring tools and analytics to gauge improvement and savings and to identify KPIs. Some also show usage of the tool by user, role, or department, and help determine whether the tool is being used to its full advantage across the company.

As previously stated, many providers will customize their solutions if their clients request it. Organizations should consider an innovative provider that will work with them to configure the product to the unique preferences of the organizations. It may also benefit some companies to choose a provider that offers modular solutions in case they are not sure how much of the tool they will use; the option to turn on and off modules could be to their advantage.

It is also important to work with a provider that encourages client input. Many offer forums or submission tools to allow customers to comment on specific functionality, report glitches, and submit requests for improvement. Some providers send out regular surveys to assess customer satisfaction, and some host regular customer roundtables to dive deeper into various issues or gaps in how their solutions work for their clients. A provider should not be afraid of or resistant to feedback from clients, but should embrace it so as to continually improve their tool. Organizations should take advantage of any forums available to submit feedback, as this will improve their interaction with and ROI from the tool.

Finally, continue to innovate. Change management does not end when an AP or procurement solution is live, nor has an organization reached peak efficiency and optimization just because they have automated their back office. There is always further to go with technology and business improvement. Innovators should continue to seek out new ideas on how to improve, strategize, and transform their departments to the long-term advantage of their company. Information on how to do so can be found from analyst firms, business and tech journals, and peers.


Change management is vital when adopting a P2P solution, as it maximizes pre-implementation buy-in, improves the configuration stage of implementation, ensures solid integration with existing systems, and increases post-implementation user uptake. Organizations will be able to not only eliminate current AP and procurement pain points, but also plan and prepare to tackle future pain points before they occur. P2P software providers want their clients to get the most out of their solutions, so providers often offer a variety of change management services before, during, and after implementation. The following profiles give an overview of two P2P software providers that work with their customers to prepare for and optimize software adoption.

Paramount WorkPlace

Paramount WorkPlace develops, sells, and supports advanced web-based and native mobile requisitioning, procurement, accounts payable, and expense solutions for mid-market and enterprise organizations across a range of industries worldwide. WorkPlace Payments provides enterprise users with the option of adding automated ACH payments within the WorkPlace Spend Management solution for a fully centralized standalone P2P platform. The user interface offers flexible P2P automation and robust expense reporting that is easy for employees, effective for management, and powerful for accounting.

HeadquartersDetroit, Michigan
Other LocationsGeorgia, Vermont, Washington; Ontario, Canada
Number of Employees50-75
Number of Customers750, with over 131,000 global users
Target Verticals14 industries including Hospitality, Healthcare, Nonprofit, Professional Sports, Government, Utilities, Agriculture, Education, Entertainment, Technology, Life Sciences, Pharmaceuticals, Professional Services, and Telecommunications
Awards/RecognitionsPresident’s Club for Microsoft Dynamics; Blackbaud Financial Edge and NXT Procurement Platform of Choice; Microsoft Gold Development Partner, Sage Development Partner – Gold and Certified for Acumatica

Solution Overview

The Paramount WorkPlace software solution can be deployed in SaaS/cloud-based and on-premise environments. It is offered as a standalone solution as well as a certified out-of-the-box seamless integration to leading ERPs including Microsoft Dynamics (GP, NAV, SL, AX, Dynamics 365 Business Central), Sage ERP (100, 300, 500), Sage Intacct, Blackbaud Financial Edge NXT, Acumatica, Acumatica Construction, SAP, and Oracle-NetSuite via ERP-specific APIs.

WorkPlace also offers tailored integrations for other ERPs and industry-specific solutions using its Data Integration API toolset. The solution features multi-company, multi-language, and multi-currency support, as well as global taxation options (including HST, VAT, and GST). For system security, the solution leverages roles-based controls and several industry-driven authentication protocols including single sign-on, LDAP, active directory, OAuth2, and two-factor authentication.

WorkPlace offers an intuitive user interface for both its desktop and mobile app solutions. The modern design allows companies to onboard users quickly and ensures strong user adoption rates. The WorkPlace native mobile app provides purchasing, full requisition entry, and approval functionality from a user’s mobile app. Users can browse and shop company catalogs, request items for purchase, save items to cart, and submit items, as well as review, approve, and reject requisitions, add attachments, and add comments.


The Paramount WorkPlace requisition solution can be configured to different types of users, roles, departments, and vendor marketplaces. The internal WorkPlace catalog system and punch-out capabilities allow requestors to search for goods and services through a catalog-style shopping experience, as well as through a traditional transaction-style interface.

The solution supports centralized purchasing across multiple locations, allowing users to request, enter, and process transactions under the same controls companywide. WorkPlace offers cost controls that integrate with and help enforce organizations’ budgets, vendor contracts, and project rules, as well as an automated three-tier tax engine for effective financial integration and reporting. Line-level multi-company and inter-company capabilities provide a single centralized procurement portal for larger organizations to integrate with multiple entities in their ERP.

Purchasing approvers can approve requests within the application, on their mobile app, or directly from notification emails. The solution’s parallel, line-level approval engine offers approvers unlimited approval levels and approval paths. Built-in collaboration tools include email notifications, web form questionnaires, delegation, automated escalation rules, ad hoc approval routing, and logged communication notes throughout the approval workflow.

Depending on an organization’s preferences, POs can be automatically generated and issued to vendors upon approval or reviewed and consolidated by central purchasing teams. WorkPlace also includes full PO and change order management. Document retention, revision number tracking, quantity status, and a detailed audit log are available for every PO line and for users involved throughout the purchasing life cycle.

Paramount WorkPlace offers multiple user-tailored receiving options, including filtered desktop receiving, one-click PO receipt, and detailed transaction entry. Users can be automatically notified when their requests have been fulfilled, unmatched invoices have been received, or expected orders have not been received by the specified delivery date. Upon receipt of an order, the solution supports both 2- and 3-way matching with automatic purchasing accruals that can be integrated at the GL level.

WorkPlace offers AI, machine learning, and optical character recognition (OCR). Invoices are entered into the solution by either scanning the invoice via OCR or by manually entering the information. WorkPlace’s Smart Invoice Capture tool incorporates rich machine learning functionality capable of recognizing patterns of user behavior and recommending data inputs, reducing the time users spend on keying and correcting data. Scanned invoices can be automatically or manually matched to a PO. Paramount WorkPlace’s solution offers 2- and 3-way matching for loading one or more PO lines from one or more POs. WorkPlace uses advanced OCR capabilities to improve PO invoice matching success rates. This reduces the required time spent processing transactions and troubleshooting data entry, reduces financial reporting errors, and allows procurement and payables staff to spend more time on strategic initiatives and critical thinking.

The approval workflow tool can handle any approval structure and organizational hierarchy. Configurable approval workflows support header, line, PO, and non-PO rules-based routing with unlimited approvals and approval path capabilities. Unmatched invoices are automatically sent through an exception workflow based on custom invoice variances, such as quantity or amount thresholds. The solution also offers escalations and reminders, out-of-office forwarding, and delegation for invoice approvals. Invoice approvers can approve or reject invoices from their mobile devices either directly from the notification email or through the mobile app.

After approval and a payment has been processed, remittance information is automatically transmitted to the respective suppliers, and payment information is updated and available for internal stakeholders to view from the originating transactions. Suppliers and vendors have access to a self-service vendor portal with automatic PO notifications and the ability to submit PO, non-PO, and service invoices. They can upload invoices and attachments from the portal and are automatically notified by email when POs are available to view and match. They can also manage their own contact information; additions and updates are automatically fed to the WorkPlace approval workflow for review. The system automatically syncs approved changes with the client’s associated ERP. WorkPlace Supplier Network currently has over 850 suppliers registered. Companies can engage with new suppliers from the network or invite their own to register and participate in the network.

Paramount WorkPlace is focused on empowering CPOs and CFOs to analyze financial data strategically with a 360-degree view of their KPIs in one dashboard. To enable this, Workplace offers reporting tools and data analysis tools from a single dashboard that allows users to manage, evaluate, improve, and optimize many areas of their business. Users have the freedom to define their own metrics, customize the view, select from over 20 standard charts, create unlimited personalized charts, drill deeper into the data, and export the data for use in other applications. Out of the box, the Paramount WorkPlace solution includes over 70 printed reports, dashboard charts, and metrics that cover all P2P modules.

Implementation and Pricing

Implementation of Paramount WorkPlace varies depending on the organization’s size and the licensed solution. The typical go-live duration is 60-90 days. Paramount WorkPlace and authorized resellers offer one-to-one comprehensive training and department-wide training, as well as training workshops and on-demand custom training. Customers receive unlimited support, including free technical support via toll-free phone, email, or chat, and access to an online customer center with learning materials.

Pricing structures include a perpetual annual license or monthly SaaS payments.

Wax Digital

Founded in 2001, Wax Digital is a UK-based eProcurement and spend management company. Its product suite, web3, supports over 265,000 users, with £35 billion of spend under management in 102 countries. Wax Digital web3 supports B2B requirements for North America, Latin America, Europe, and Australasia.

Wax Digital’s software suite has been developed on a single code base and is deployed in a range of standalone modules that seamlessly interoperate to deliver a fully integrated Source-to-Settle platform. The suite’s modules include eSourcing, Contract Management, Procure-to-Pay, Spend Analysis, Supplier Relationship Management, Supplier Information Management, and web3 Connect, a systems integration platform. Wax Digital works with some of the world’s leading organizations across a wide range of industry sectors.

HeadquartersManchester, England
Other LocationsNew York City; Chicago; Stockholm; Copenhagen
Number of Employees94
Number of CustomersMore than 100
Target VerticalsAll verticals, with particular strengths in Food & Beverage, Construction, Healthcare, Defense & Aerospace, and Financial Services
Partners/ResellersExostar, Sapphire Systems, EFFSO, Proxima
Awards/RecognitionsGartner Magic Quadrant Procure-to-Pay Suites “Visionary”; Spend Matters “50 To Know” Vendor; Spend Matters Solution Map Leader; Red Herring Europe 100 Winner; NProfilic North Tech 2019 winner for ‘Best application of Tech’

Solution Overview

Wax Digital is highly focused on integration, and offers a versatile integration platform as a service, web3 Connect, which connects with all leading ERPs and facilitates rapid delivery and deployment of interfaces to and between third-party systems. Wax Digital operates an ISO 27001–certified information security management system that preserves confidentiality, responsibility, and availability of information across all locations.

Change Management

Wax Digital’s Implementation team works with its clients to aid the change management process in a variety of ways, including business case justification, stakeholder uptake, user onboarding, and benefits realization/demonstration, tailoring its implementation approach to each client. In a series of workshops between Wax Digital’s Project Management team and its clients, process and system requirements are defined, illustrated, evaluated, and reinforced using core system demonstrations. The workshops are designed to cover all key areas such as the organizational structure, purchasing processes, approvals, reporting, supplier relationships, and general system maintenance to optimize the final solution’s performance.

Wax Digital’s standard implementation approach (including workshops) ensures that key stakeholders from different departments are present and able to share their opinions on the solution’s key design areas, which in turn influences their enthusiasm and willingness to adopt the new solution. After go-live, Wax Digital is committed to listening to its clients’ needs and continually seeks to collaborate with them through user groups, forums, product demonstrations, dedicated account managers, and feedback surveys, giving clients the opportunity to highlight enhancements they would like to see brought to web3.

Wax Digital enables clients to measure the success of P2P processes and technology usage over time by monitoring a set of key success criteria. This typically includes KPIs for user onboarding, percentage of suppliers using the portal, ratio of POs to invoices, and ROI statistics. Additionally, web3 supports improvement measurements through built-in analytics and reporting; a management dashboard is available that allows authorized personnel to monitor the activities of users, including the number of events run and the value of the spend associated with their account.


web3 P2P’s catalog management system is able to support the creation and maintenance of multiple product catalogs for the selection of goods, creating shopping baskets from which a requisition can be created; it also supports Level 1 and Level 2 punch-outs to third-party catalog solutions. All product and prices within the catalogs are associated with the appropriate supplier and contract.

Configurable approval schemes, set against elements such as value, budget position, and spend category, dictate approval requirements on requisitions and automatically route the requisition lines accordingly. Approvals can be made by email without the need to log in to the system, and a range of auto-escalation, out-of-office and pool approver facilities ensures the process is expedited as efficiently as possible.

POs are generated post-approval and in accordance with implementation-specific rules, and orders can be automatically dispatched to the supplier. Multiple suppliers are also supported on a single requisition, and once the approval process has been completed, the requisition is automatically split into individual POs by supplier. The options for PO delivery methods include supplier portal, export to third-party systems, email attachments, and mail delivery. Once an order has been acknowledged by the supplier, it enters a queue awaiting receipt, and the nominated receiver can access it from the Receipting menu function. Return features are also included.

web3 provides a client’s AP team with several tools for paper and electronic invoice importing, matching, and exception handling. This includes invoices submitted via electronic invoicing (EDI/XML), portal submission, and email submission. The solution allows data to be read directly from digital email attachments (such as pdf) for 100% data accuracy, whilst OCR technology extracts data from paper and digital invoices, and matches it against POs and receipts.

For invoices that do not match POs or receipts, web3 initiates escalation and approval workflows. An AI-driven automated escalation process directs the invoice for processing depending on the available information/status (e.g., the invoice requires coding and approvals, mismatch management). Invoice validation rules are client-specific and configured during the project workshop phase. web3 allows users to track invoice statuses, and receive dashboard alerts and email notifications on invoices. web3 also supports invoicing and payment of recurring bills, such as utilities and rent, with automated approvals. Out-of-office functionality allows approvals and validation activities to be delegated to another user, with an optional date set for the automatic end of the delegation period.

The web3 supplier portal offers direct invoice submission/generation in multiple formats including EDI/XML, portal input (web forms), document upload, and PO flip. Suppliers that use the portal can receive, review, print, or download all PO-related documents online. They can receive an automated alert once goods have been received, then submit invoices electronically using approved templates. For ensuring suppliers adopt and use the portal, Wax Digital can provide a dedicated supplier onboarding service. web3 offers a wide range of standard, parameter-driven reports and reporting tools. These include an AP dashboard and reports that cover invoice summary, invoices sent for payment, invoice by payment date, and daily/monthly/quarterly activity. web3 supports Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services and PowerBI for custom report creation on a personalized dashboard.

Implementation and Pricing

The average timescale for full integration/implementation of web3 P2P is four to six months, depending on the specific requirements of a client. web3 P2P is licensed annually on a named-user basis, with a one-time implementation fee charged in the first year.


The findings presented in this report are based on online surveys conducted by Levvel Research in February and April 2019 among more than 250 finance and accounting decision makers and influencers, as well as more than 350 procurement decision makers and influencers in organizations with at least $1M in total revenue across all industries. Respondents were screened for their familiarity with their organization’s accounts payable, invoice receipt, and invoice routing processes. The data was weighted to represent the proportions of SME, mid-market, and enterprise organizations in Levvel Research’s database. This distribution is shown below.

About Levvel Research

Levvel Research, formerly PayStream Advisors, is a research and advisory firm that operates within the IT consulting company, Levvel. Levvel Research is focused on many areas of innovative technology, including business process automation, DevOps, emerging payment technologies, full-stack software development, mobile application development, cloud infrastructure, and content publishing automation. Levvel Research’s team of experts provide targeted research content to address the changing technology and business process needs of competitive organizations across a range of verticals. In short, Levvel Research is dedicated to maximizing returns and minimizing risks associated with technology investment. Levvel Research’s reports, white papers, webinars, and tools are available free of charge at www.levvel.io


All Research Reports produced by Levvel Research are a collection of Levvel Research’s professional opinions and are based on Levvel Research’s reasonable efforts to compile and analyze, in Levvel Research’s sole professional opinion, the best sources reasonably available to Levvel Research at any given time. Any opinions reflect Levvel Research’s judgment at the time and are subject to change. Anyone using this report assumes sole responsibility for the selection and / or use of any and all content, research, publications, materials, work product or other item contained herein. As such Levvel Research does not make any warranties, express or implied, with respect to the content of this Report, including, without limitation, those of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Levvel Research shall not be liable under any circumstances or under any theory of law for any direct, indirect, special, consequential or incidental damages, including without limitation, damages for lost profits, business failure or loss, arising out of use of the content of the Report, whether or not Levvel Research has been advised of the possibility of such damages and shall not be liable for any damages incurred arising as a result of reliance upon the content or any claim attributable to errors, omissions or other inaccuracies in the content or interpretations thereof.

Authored By

Anna Barnett, Research Senior Manager

Anna Barnett

Research Senior Manager, Levvel

Jamie Kim, Research Content Specialist

Jamie Kim

Research Content Specialist

Major Bottoms Jr., Senior Research Consultant

Major Bottoms Jr.

Senior Research Consultant

Meet our Experts

Anna Barnett, Research Senior Manager

Anna Barnett

Research Senior Manager, Levvel

Anna Barnett is a Research Senior Manager for Levvel Research. She manages Levvel's team of analysts and all research content delivery, and helps lead research development strategy for the firm's many technology focus areas. Anna joined Levvel through the acquisition of PayStream Advisors, and for the past several years has served as an expert in several facets of business process automation software. She also covers digital transformation trends and technology, including around DevOps strategy, design systems, application development, and cloud migration. Anna has extensive experience in research-based analytical writing and editing, as well as sales and marketing content creation.

Jamie Kim, Research Content Specialist

Jamie Kim

Research Content Specialist

Jamie Kim is a Research Content Specialist for Levvel Research based in New York City. She develops and writes research-based content, including data-driven reports, whitepapers, and case studies, as well as market insights within various digital transformation spaces. Jamie’s research focus is on business automation processes, including Procure-to-Pay, as well as DevOps, design practices, and cloud platforms. In addition to her research skills and content creation, Jamie has expertise in design and front-end development. She came to Levvel with a research and technical writing background at an IT consulting company focused on upcoming AI and machine learning technologies, as well as academic book editorial experience at Oxford University Press working on its music list.

Major Bottoms Jr., Senior Research Consultant

Major Bottoms Jr.

Senior Research Consultant

Major Bottoms Jr. is a Senior Research Consultant for Levvel Research based in Charlotte, NC. He plays a key role in the analysis and presentation of data for Levvel’s research reports, webinars, and consulting engagements. Major’s expertise lies in the Procure-to-Pay, Source-to-Settle, and travel and expense management processes and software, as well as technologies and strategies across DevOps, digital payments, design systems, and application development. Prior to joining Levvel, Major held various roles in the mortgage finance field at Bank of America and Wells Fargo. Major graduated with a degree in Finance from the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland.

Let's chat.

You're doing big things, and big things come with big challenges. We're here to help.

Read the Report

By clicking the button below you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

levvel mark white

Let's improve the world together.

© Levvel & Endava 2024